Categories
Medicare

The Most Important Person in the Healthcare Debate

The Most Important Person in the Healthcare Debate

No, not President Donald Trump. Not even Health and Human Services Secretary Tom Price.
It isn’t Speaker of the House Paul Ryan and it isn’t Senate Majority leader Mitch McConnell.
 Who could they be?

You’re probably not familiar with her because she likes to stay out of the spotlight, but she has a lot of power and influence in Washington. The most important person in the healthcare debate, right now, is Elizabeth MacDonough. 

MacDonough’s role is Parliamentarian to the United States Senate. Simply put, she is an attorney who advises the Senate on official matters. MacDonough has a huge task ahead—advising the Senate on how they can proceed with the American Health Care Act (AHCA), which aims to repeal and replace much of the Affordable Care Act (ACA).

Normally, 60 votes are needed to pass a bill in the Senate. However, if it’s a bill that only impacts federal spending (referred to as a budget reconciliation bill), only 51 votes are needed. Republicans currently hold 52 seats in the Senate, Democrats and Republicans don’t seem to agree on anything, so Republicans are using the budget reconciliation process to try and oust key parts of the ACA. This means the ACA can’t be repealed in its entirety, but the financially-driven components of the law can be overturned. 

Here’s where MacDonough’s role becomes so important. She instructs the Senate on what provisions can (or can’t) be included in a budget reconciliation bill, and there are some things in the AHCA (at least in its current form) that walk a fine line.

For example:

If passed, the AHCA would let insurance companies charge older people a premium five times higher than that of a younger person.  It would also give states the ability to determine which benefits are essential and must be included in health insurance plans.

Are these budget-related items? Or are these insurance rules? Republicans will tell you these types of things impact premiums, which tie back to subsidies, and therefore effect federal spending. Democrats will tell you that’s a far stretch and these types of things are insurance rules which require 60 votes to pass in the Senate.

But it doesn’t matter what Republicans or Democrats think.  It matters what MacDonough thinks.

After hearing arguments from both sides of the political aisle, MacDonough will provide the Senate with guidance on provisions that are budget-neutral and advise what must be removed or changed under the current version of the AHCA. 

Share This Post

Questions? Speak with a licensed agent today
for more information on short term

Call Us at 855-563-6993

More To Explore

Categories
Medicare

Clarifying the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act Impact on Commuter Plans

Clarifying the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act Impact on Commuter Plans

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act was signed into law at the end of 2017. There still seems to be some confusion in the market as to how this law impacted Commuter Plans. The information below should help clarify some of this confusion.

1) The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act did not have any direct impact to employees who participate in a Commuter Plan. Employees can still make tax-free salary reduction contributions for qualified transit and parking expenses which are incurred to get to and from their home and place of work.The maximum tax-free election for 2018 is $260 per month for mass transit and qualified parking.

2) The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act eliminated the ability for employers to receive corporate income tax deductions for fringe benefits they provide, including qualified transportation expenses. Because the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act reduced corporate income tax rates, there are some benefits and other items they can no longer write-off. This is best illustrated with an example:

Assume an employee earned $40,000 per year and put $1,000 over the course of a year into a Commuter Plan. Under previous law, the employer could write-off all $40,000 of the employee’s compensation as an operating expense. Under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, the employer cannot write-off any compensation that is directed into a Commuter Plan. As a result, the employer can only write-off $39,000 of the employee’s compensation in this example.

Similarly, if an employer contributed directly to an employee’s Commuter Plan, the employer could not write-off that contribution for corporate income tax purposes. However, the employee could still receive any employer-funded contribution income tax-free.

Contributions (whether made by the employee or employer) still avoid Social Security and Medicare taxes for both the employer and employee.

This all took effect on January 1, 2018.

3) The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act suspended the qualified bicycle commuting benefit through 2025. The employer-funded $20 maximum monthly bicycle benefit must be treated as taxable compensation to employees if employers continue to make this benefit available. This also took effect on January 1, 2018.
 

Share This Post

Questions? Speak with a licensed agent today
for more information on short term

Call Us at 855-563-6993

More To Explore

Categories
Medicare

New Association Health Plan Rules Finalized

New Association Health Plan Rules Finalized

Small businesses can finally join forces when purchasing health insurance coverage.

Last week, the Department of Labor (DOL) finalized new rules pertaining to association health plans (AHPs). The intent of the new rules are to make it easier for small businesses (including self-employed individuals) to join forces when purchasing health insurance coverage. AHPs would be regulated similarly to large group health plans which are exempt from some of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) market reforms,including the requirement to cover all ten essential health benefits. AHPs are expected to have lower premiums because of the relaxed rules, however, most of these plans will be subject to state law and applicable state mandated benefits.

Under previous rules, the DOL required a much greater commonality of interest for small businesses to band together and purchase coverage. Under the new rules, small businesses in the same industry or geographic location can buy into an AHP. For example, an AHP could be established for restaurant workers or real estate agents working anywhere in the country. Similarly, an AHP could be established and made available to small businesses who are located in the same state, city, county or metropolitan area. 

AHPs would still be prohibited from denying coverage to a business or charging a higher premium based on the health status of its employees, but there would be some different ways premium could be charged. As an example, an AHP made available to the agriculture industry could charge employers different premiums based on their line of business, such as growing crops vs. raising livestock. Geography-based AHPs would also allow for premium discrepancies. As an example, an AHP available in a state could charge different premiums to construction companies and retailers. Many of the other premium establishment rules that apply to large group health plans will also be available for AHPs to use.

AHPs can be made available in the fully-insured market as early as September 1, 2018. AHPs that are already operating in the self-insured market can incorporate the new rules beginning on January 1, 2019, and new self-insured AHPs can begin operating on April 1, 2019. We are now in a bit of a waiting game to see the types of AHPs that will be made available, where they will be available and which insurance carriers will participate in this market.

While some people are applauding the new AHP rules, others are not. Some are referring to AHPs as junk insurance since these plans don’t have to cover essential health benefits. These people believe AHPs will still discriminate against people with pre-existing conditions even though health status cannot be used to determine eligibility. For example, an AHP could exclude coverage for diabetes and therefore discriminate against people with that condition. Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey and New York Attorney General Barbara Underwood have also issued a joint statement indicating their intent to file a lawsuit related to the new AHP rules. They believe the new rules are unlawful and skirt the requirements and consumer protections that are supposed to apply to small business plans under the ACA.

Share This Post

Questions? Speak with a licensed agent today
for more information on short term

Call Us at 855-563-6993

More To Explore

Categories
Medicare

Obamacare Lawsuit

Obamacare Lawsuit

Is the Affordable Care Act Unconstitutional?

A lawsuit contesting the legality of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), also known as Obamacare, is starting to gain a lot of attention. Last December, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act was signed into law. Part of this law made the penalty under the Individual Mandate $0 starting in 2019. Technically the Individual Mandate is still in place, but there will no longer be any penalty under federal law for failing to health insurance.

In February, a coalition of 20 states led by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton filed a lawsuit against the federal government contesting that Obamacare is now unconstitutional. To summarize, the lawsuit filed references a 2012 Supreme Court ruling which found the Individual Mandate to be constitutional because it was tax. The lawsuit further argues that if there is no tax penalty, then the Individual Mandate cannot exist. This is what the Supreme Court ruled in 2012, according to the lawsuit.

To make things even more interesting, the Justice Department has indicated they do not plan on defending the constitutionality of the Obamacare. Attorney General Jeff Sessions sent a letter to Senate and House members in which he indicates the Justice Department agrees in large part with the 20 states who have brought forth the suit. Sessions also suggests that other consumer protections that are part of Obamacare won’t be valid either. This includes things like the prohibition of denying coverage to a person based on pre-existing conditions.

However, the challenge to Obamacare won’t be without a fight. A coalition of 17 states (technically 16 but Washington D.C. is also part of the coalition) led by California Attorney General Xavier Becerra has filed a motion to intervene in the case. These states contest that Obamacare is still constitutional even with the absence of a penalty, and they also contest that insurance markets will collapse if Obamacare is struck down.

This will likely be a long drawn out process which takes several months to go through the court system. It’s expected that there will be appeals to any court decision, and this may find its way back to the U.S. Supreme Court for another critical decision on Obamacare.

Share This Post

Questions? Speak with a licensed agent today
for more information on short term

Call Us at 855-563-6993

More To Explore

Categories
Medicare

Will the ACA Get Repealed This Week?

Will the ACA Get Repealed This Week?

This is What Senators Lindsey Graham and Bill Cassidy Plan to Add and Eliminate.

Senators Lindsey Graham (R-SC) and Bill Cassidy (R-LA) are spearheading efforts to repeal and replace substantial parts of the Affordable Care Act (ACA). The bill they’ve introduced is expected to go to vote later this week.  There are many changes that the so-called “Graham-Cassidy” bill would make to the ACA—here are three that stand out the most:

  1. Block Grants to States: 
    The bill would end funding for Exchange subsidies and Medicaid expansion as it exists under the ACA today. Instead, states would be provided block grants from the federal government, and states would decide how those funds are used.  Each state could opt out of certain ACA provisions, such as those that apply to pre-existing conditions and essential health benefits. But only if there was first a program in place to provide adequate and affordable coverage to lower income and/or high risk individuals.
  2. The End of Mandates: 
    The bill would make penalties under the Individual and Employer Mandates $0 retroactively to 2016. This is not a direct repeal of the mandates, but it essentially has the same effect as a repeal.
  3. Enhancements to HSAs:
    Contribution limits for Health Savings Accounts (HSAs) would increase. They would be equal to the maximum out-of-pocket limit for an HSA-eligible health plan ($6,650/single, $13,300/family in 2018). In addition, there would be no more need to obtain a prescription to make over-the-counter drugs an eligible expense. Several other HSA enhancements were also included in the bill.

For a section-by-section summary of the Graham-Cassidy bill, please click here.    

The biggest controversy of the Graham-Cassidy bill is about the block grants to states. Federal funding for healthcare would be fixed and ultimately less than what it would otherwise be under the ACA. 

There is also a worry by Democrats and even some Republicans that this type of system does not provide enough protections for people with pre-existing conditions. 

The main underlying issues and concerns that have been debated in Washington D.C. throughout the year appear to be the same with the Graham-Cassidy bill.

It’s unclear if Senate Republicans will get the 51 votes they need to pass this legislation and move it onto the next phase. Keep in mind that even if they do get the 51 votes, the bill would have to go back to the House of Representatives and it’s unclear if it would pass in that Chamber again. 

Share This Post

Questions? Speak with a licensed agent today
for more information on short term

Call Us at 855-563-6993

More To Explore

Categories
Individual and Family

3 States Now Have an Individual Mandate

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act signed into law last year wiped out the federal penalty for not having health insurance (a.k.a. the Individual Mandate) starting in 2019. Some state officials are concerned that the elimination of the penalty could destabilize their local insurance markets, and they have responded with their own Individual Mandate requirements.

  1. The state of New Jersey passed an Individual Mandate law on May 30 which will be effective in 2019. The penalty will be calculated using a formula similar to the one used for the current federal mandate. In general, the penalty will be the greater of $695 per adult ($347.50 per child) or 2.5% of household income. The penalty will be capped at the lowest-priced bronze plan available on the state’s marketplace. Additional details may be found here.
  2. The state of Vermont also passed an Individual Mandate law on May 28, but this won’t be effective until 2020. An interesting part with the Vermont mandate is that specific details are not yet known. The financial penalty and enforcement mechanisms will be determined during the state’s 2019 legislative sessions. Additional details may be found here.
  3. The state of Massachusetts was actually the first state to implement an Individual Mandate, and they did this well before the passage of the Affordable Care Act (ACA). The mandate in Massachusetts was signed into law back in 2006. In general, the state’s Department of Revenue issues guidance each year with details on the penalty amounts which are tied to a predetermined formula. The penalty amount varies by income with the maximum penalty applying to those without insurance and earning more than 300% of the Federal Poverty Level (FPL). In 2018, the maximum penalty is $119 per month, or $1,428 per year. The state imposed penalty is reduced by any amount owed under the current federal penalty. Additional details may be found here.

Lawmakers in other states are also considering some type of Individual Mandate. States like California, Connecticut, Maryland and Minnesota are considering laws that would require their residents to have health insurance or pay a penalty, and these aren’t the only states considering a mandate. Other states may also follow suit. It’s unclear which additional states will pass mandate legislation, but it does seem like there is a good chance there will be more.

Categories
Individual and Family

Packaged Health Insurance

We all know health insurance has an expensive price tag. Even plans with high deductibles and small provider networks can come with costly premiums. And for those who don’t have an employer chipping in for coverage, or for people who don’t qualify for premium assistance on the Affordable Care Act’s Health Insurance Marketplace, those premiums can be in the tens of thousands of dollars.

Enter Packaged Health Insurance 

Packaged health insurance (sometimes called bundled health insurance) is a way of combining several limited benefit insurance plans and products to create a more comprehensive set of benefits at a lower price than traditional major medical coverage. As an example, the package might include any combination of the following types of plans or products:

✓ Short-term medical plans which provide limited duration health insurance coverage. These plans don’t cover the same benefits as a traditional major medical plan and usually have an annual cap on benefits. Learn more about short-term health insurance.
✓ Accident plans typically pay out a lump sum of cash to the insured per each accident of injury.
 Hospital indemnity plans typically pay out a lump sum of cash to the insured based on the number of days in the hospital.
✓ Critical illness or cancer plans typically pay out a lump sum of cash to the insured upon being diagnosed with a critical illness (such as a stroke or heart attack) or cancer.
✓ Fixed indemnity plans typically pay out a lump sum of cash to the insured after receiving certain medical treatments. For example, a lump sum of cash may be paid out for each office visit or emergency room visit.
✓ Dental and vision plans provide insurance coverage for dental and vision expenses.
✓ Telehealth provides a low-cost way of speaking with a nurse or doctor over the phone for treatment related to common illnesses.
✓ Discount plans provide discounts for certain medical expenses, such as prescription drugs.

Packaged health insurance may be considered by more people in 2019 when the Individual Mandate penalty for not having a traditional major medical plan goes away.

Advantages of Packaged Health Insurance

Depending on the options chosen, packaged health insurance can range from 30% to 50% less than a traditional ACA health plan. Aside from the lower price tag, there are several other advantages to this type of insurance.

There is no coordination of benefits between the separate plans, so services that qualify for benefits under more than one policy could receive benefits from multiple plans. Payment is typically made to the policy-holder, so they would be free to use the money in any way they want—including for things like house or car payments. Also, unlike traditional health plans, these plans are available for purchase at any time during the year, as there are no open enrollment or special enrollment periods.

It is important to note that packaged health insurance does not satisfy the ACA Individual Mandate requirements. However, packaged health insurance may be considered by more people in 2019 when the penalty for not having a traditional major medical plan is eliminated.

Potential Drawbacks

Packaged health insurance is not without its drawbacks, though. It often involves the completion of multiple insurance applications with premium payments to multiple companies which can be a headache for some people. Some plans are underwritten, which means they may be declined based on health status. Gaps in coverage are also likely to occur if there is a catastrophic health event.

Nonetheless, it’s an alternative to explore if a traditional plan is too expensive, especially for those individuals who usually have low medical costs. Plus, it’s better to have some coverage than no coverage.

This is not to say that we would recommend replacing an ACA plan with a package of various limited benefit plans. Although they can be costly, these plans provide the most comprehensive coverage and the highest level of protection. Still, for individuals who are currently uninsured and don’t have a qualifying event to enroll in ACA coverage mid-year, packaged insurance may be a good option to hold them over until the next open enrollment. For individuals with high-deductible health plans, packaged insurance can also be a good way to offset some of their out-of-pocket costs.

Get an instant quote for a Short-Term Medical, Accident or Critical Illness plan.

Categories
Employee Benefits

Employer Mandate Update

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) recently released Revenue Procedure 2018-34 which includes details about the affordability percentage related to the Employer Mandate for the upcoming year. In 2019, coverage will be considered affordable if an employee has to pay no more than 9.86% of their household income for self-only coverage. As most employers don’t know the household income of their employees, three alternative safe harbor methods may be used:

  1. W-2 Safe Harbor Method: Coverage will be considered affordable if the employee has to pay no more than 9.86% of their current year wages according to Box 1 of their W-2.
  2. Monthly Rate of Pay Method: Coverage will be considered affordable if the employee has to pay no more than 9.86% of their monthly rate of pay.
  3. Federal Poverty Level Method: Coverage will be considered affordable if the employee has to pay no more than 9.86% of the most recently published mainland Federal Poverty Level (FPL) for a household of one.

A summary of the Employer Mandate affordability percentages since its inception has been provided below. If you recall, the Employer Mandate was originally set to take effect in 2014, but it was delayed until 2015. The original 9.5% affordability percentage has been adjusted each year for inflation.

Click here to learn how to calculate affordability under the Employer Mandate.
Categories
Employee Benefits

Calculating ACA Affordability under the Employer Mandate

The original version of this article was published on January 15, 2016. It was updated on November 7, 2017, due to inflationary changes for 2018.  

The Employer Mandate guidelines state that coverage is affordable when an employee has to pay no more than 9.5% of their household income (inflation-adjusted to 9.56% for the 2018 plan year) for self-only coverage which is offered, but which employers know the household income of an employee? As a result, there are three alternative methods that an employer can rely upon when determining if the coverage they offer is affordable. These methods are explained below and some general examples on how to apply each method have also been provided. Assume in each example that the employer has a calendar plan year for 2018.

W-2 Safe Harbor Method

Coverage is deemed affordable if the employee is charged no more than 9.56% of current year wages according to Box 1 of their W-2. Please note that this method is relatively simple to apply, but it uses current year wages which won’t be known until the year is over. That means an employer may not know if coverage is affordable until the year is over.

Example 1: Joe is employed at XYZ Inc. for the entire year and is offered coverage for all 12 months. His wages according to Box 1 of his W-2 are $28,000. XYZ Inc. will be considered to offer affordable coverage provided Joe is not charged more than $223.07 per month for coverage. The formula is ($28,000 x .0956)/12 = $223.07.

Example 2: Joe is hired by XYZ Inc. on May 15, 2018, and is offered coverage on August 1, 2018. His W-2 wages according to Box 1 of his W-2 are $20,000. In this scenario, an adjustment can be made to the W-2 wages used in the affordability calculation since Joe was not employed for the entire year and he was subject to a waiting period before coverage was offered.

Formula = W-2 wages * (calendar months offered coverage / months of employment) = $20,000 * (5/8) = $12,500

The W-2 wages used in the affordability calculation are adjusted to $12,500 for the 5 months Joe is offered coverage. XYZ Inc. will be considered to offer affordable coverage provided Joe is not charged more than $239.00 per month for coverage. The formula is ($12,500 x .0956)/5 = $239.00.

Rate of Pay Safe Harbor Method

Coverage is deemed affordable if the employee is charged no more than 9.56% of their monthly rate of pay at the start of the coverage period. Always use 130 hours when determining the monthly rate of pay for hourly employees. For non-hourly employees, affordability is tied to the monthly salary at the start of the coverage period. The rate of pay method should not be used for employees who receive wages by virtue of tips or employees who are paid solely by commissions. 

Example 1: Kathy works for XYZ Inc. and makes $15 per hour as of the start of the plan year.  XYZ Inc. will be considered to offer affordable coverage provided Kathy is not charged more than $186.42 per month for coverage. The formula is ($15 x 130) x .0956 = $186.42.  

Federal Poverty Level (FPL) Safe Harbor Method

Coverage is deemed affordable if the employee is charged no more than 9.56% of the most recently published mainland FPL for a household of one. 

Example 1: The most recently published mainland FPL for a household of one is $12,060. XYZ Inc. will be considered to offer affordable coverage to employees who are not charged more than $96.08 per month for coverage. The formula is ($12,060 x .0956)/12 = $96.08.The materials contained within this communication are provided for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal or tax advice. 

Categories
Employee Benefits

Medicare and Group Health Plans

More employees than ever before are working beyond age 65, and this also happens to be the age when most people in the U.S. qualify for Medicare. Requirements of when an employee is eligible for both a group health plan and Medicare vary. Employers and plan administrators need to understand their options.  Let’s stating with understanding the basics of Medicare.

The ABCD’s of Medicare

Medicare is comprised of four parts, each of which is identified by a letter in the alphabet.

  1. Part A covers hospitalizations and inpatient care. Most people can enroll in Part A without having to pay any premium.
  2. Part B covers office visits and outpatient care. Most people must pay a premium to enroll in Part B. In 2017, the premium starts at $134/month and increases for higher income earners.

Parts A and B are referred to as Original Medicare, and the benefits are administered by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), a federal government agency.

  1. Part C is more commonly called the Medicare Advantage program. Under the Medicare Advantage program, private insurance companies administer Part A and B benefits, and often provide more benefits than Original Medicare. There may be an additional premium charged by the private insurance company, although some plans have no additional premium.
  2. Part D covers prescription drugs. Part D plans are also administered by private insurance companies. In addition, several Medicare Advantage plans include Part D coverage.

Although technically not a “part” of Medicare, there is one other plan to point out. Medicare Supplement plans, also known as Medigap plans, are available to people enrolled in Original Medicare. These plans cover some of the deductibles and out-of-pocket costs associated with Parts A and B. Parts A and B cover 80% of your deductible and out-of-pocket costs—Medicare Supplement covers the additional 20%.

Qualifying for Medicare

Most people qualify for Medicare on the first day of the month that they turn age 65. For example, if your birthday was on May 15, your eligibility for Medicare will start on May 1.

Some people qualify for Medicare under age 65 because of a disability. These people are eligible for Medicare on the first day of the 25th month of receiving Social Security Disability Income benefits. For example, those under age 65 with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) or amyotropic lateral sclerosis (ALS) can qualify for Medicare earlier. 

Coordination of Benefits

As an Employer and plan administrator you should be prepared to answer questions from employees as they enroll or consider enrolling in Medicare while still working or having coverage through a spouse who is still working. The federal government has a set of rules in place, referred to as Medicare Secondary Payer (MSP) rules that determines which health plan is primary and secondary when an employee is enrolled in both a group health plan and Medicare. This is primarily based on the size of the employer company/business, when determining the size, make sure you include all full-time and part-time employees in the count.

  • Employers with fewer than20 full-time and/or part-time employees for each working day in each of 20 or more calendar weeks in the current or preceding year.
    • Medicare will be the primary payer of coverage. The group health plan will be the secondary payer of coverage.
  • Employers with 20 or morefull-time and/or part-time employees for each working day in each of 20 or more calendar weeks in the current or preceding year.
    • The group health plan will be the primary coverage for those people who qualify for Medicare based on turning age 65. Medicare will be the secondary payer of coverage.
  • Employers with 100 or more full-time and/or part-time employees on 50 percent or more of its business days during the previous calendar year.
    • The group health plan will be the primary coverage for those people who qualify for Medicare due to a disability. Medicare will be the secondary payer of coverage. Note: Special rules apply to individuals who qualify for Medicare based on a diagnosis of ESRD.
  • Employers offering coverage to former employees, such as retirees.
    • Medicare will be the primary payer of coverage regardless of the employer’s size. The group health plan will be the secondary payer of coverage.

Options for Employers and Plan Administrators

You may be interested in providing an alternative benefit to employees who are eligible for Medicare. This alternative benefit generally involves a financial incentive to disenroll in the group health plan and pursue coverage exclusively through Medicare. This could create savings to the employer, coverage under Medicare may be better than the group health plan, or it could be a combination of both. The coverage under Medicare may be better than the group health plan and it may save you money to have less employees on the group plan, this combination is a win-win.

The MSP rules also dictate when a financial incentive encouraging disenrollment from the group health plan may be offered. These rules are in place to protect the solvency of the Medicare Program.

  • When Medicare would be the primary coverage regardless of enrollment in the group health plan (usually, this will be employers with fewer than 20 employees), the employer may establish a Health Reimbursement Arrangement (HRA) which provides tax-free reimbursements to employees under the following circumstances:
    • The employee is offered a group major medical plan with minimum value; and
    • The employee is actually enrolled in Medicare Parts A & B; and
    • Premium reimbursements are only available to those employees enrolled in Parts A, B and/or D; and
    • Reimbursements are limited to Part B and D premiums, Medicare Supplement premiums, and excepted benefits (e.g. dental/vision). 

When Medicare would be the secondary payer of coverage if the employee were enrolled in both the group health plan and Medicare, the employer cannot offer any incentive (financial, or otherwise) that would encourage disenrollment from the group health plan. Penalties of up to $5,000 for each violation may apply.  In addition, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) may impose a penalty of up to 25% of the employer’s group health plan expenses for the relevant year.  It would not be advisable to pay or reimburse employees for Medicare premiums (with pre-tax or after-tax dollars) in situations where Medicare would be the secondary payer of coverage if the employee enrolled in the group health plan.     

  • Employers offering retiree coverage may establish an HRA that reimburses Medicare premiums and/or medical expenses without having to offer a traditional group health plan. These HRAs allow employers to fix their contributions and expenses while at the same time providing a generous benefit to retirees.

Medicare and COBRA

Medicare entitlement of the employee is listed as a COBRA qualifying event, however, it is rarely a qualifying event. In situations where it is a qualifying event, it is only a qualifying event for the spouse or children that are covered under the group health plan.

For Medicare entitlement of the employee to be a qualifying event, the terms of the group health plan must specify that the employee is no longer eligible for coverage under the group health plan once entitled to Medicare. This is prohibited in most instances by the MSP rules, and thus, Medicare entitlement of the employee is rarely a COBRA qualifying event.

Here’s an example:

John works for XYZ Company which has 200 employees and is subject to COBRA and the MSP rules. John is enrolled in the group health plan offered by XYZ Company, and he also has elected to cover his spouse Jill under the plan. John just turned age 65 and has become eligible for Medicare, but Jill is only 62 years old and is not yet eligible for Medicare. John has decided to enroll in Medicare, and consequently, Jill will be losing coverage under the group health plan.

Does XYZ Company have to offer COBRA to Jill? No.

John voluntarily dropped coverage under the group health plan, XYZ Company did not. XYZ Company is prohibited from changing John’s eligibility for coverage under the group health plan because he enrolled in Medicare. John could have continued coverage under the group health plan even while enrolled in Medicare. As a result, John’s Medicare entitlement does not trigger a COBRA qualifying event for Jill.

Employers and plan administrators should educate themselves on the Medicare and group health plan relationship. It’s important for compliance reasons, but it’s also important to help employees understand what does (or doesn’t) change upon becoming eligible for Medicare.

Download your free copy of our Medicare guide that walks you through the basics of Medicare. You will learn about your coverage options including Part A,B,C, D, Medicare Supplement and Medicare Advantage.